« A Real for the XXIst Century », is the title for the next Congress of the WAP.
What value is to be given to the indefinite article « A » that opens the title phrase? What does the juxtaposing term « real » signify? The real that we otherwise willingly conceive as being outside of structure and escaping time, can it belong more to one century than to an other? In short, how are we to understand this title?
To lift a few of the defenses that the real spontaneously creates, here are certain questions that we'll make a point of asking psychoanalysts of the WAP.
Interviews by Anaëlle Lebovits-Quenehen (ECF)
Laura Petrosino and Daniela Fernandez (EOL)
Alejandra Atencio, Gabriela Medin, Manuel Montalbán and Leonora Troianovski (ELP)
Marcus André Vieira (EBP)
New
Jean-Daniel Matet A relation to the real that evolves, the hate inherent to human fraternity reappears there. |
Leonardo Gorostiza Finding a new name for the real allows to reduce the mark of the trauma. |
Angelina Harari Renewing the practice to touch the singularity that is disjoined from any universal. |
||
Manuel Fernández Blanco There is no other politics of the symptom than that of its creation. |
Jorge Forbes Faced with the real without ideology, put unconscious and responsibility in relation. |
Mauricio Tarrab Disordre in the real: no key to make order of it! |
||
All
Éric Laurent throws his light on the real in the numeric age for us.
Psychoanalysis seeks to catch each one's real, immersed in their century..
Christiane Alberti spots the varity of the real in the quasi-dissolution of the difference between the sexes.
Is there a place for the real of psychoanalysis in our century?
questions the locus from which analysts of the WAP intervene in their practice and in their lives.
Is the real that is in play in the formation of the analyst permeable to the effects of civilization?
The tyranny of the normative will impose genetically modified humans. Let's stick to our guns!
This Century is characterised by the negation of that which, in the real, is indefinable.
Something of the real without law springs up in the youth demonstrations in Brazil.
The non-representable real escapes from the ambition of the visible all, of the formalisable all.
It's only in aiming at the knot of the symptom– RSI, ISR, SIR – that we get at the real.
In the clinic of the 21st century, the prevalence of the body excedes fictions.
An unconscious that, in being real, cannot be deciphered and by which we choose to be duped.
insists on the singular relation that each of us has with the real of sex.
Evokes a leap from the demonstration to the imagination of the real.
Flory Kruger detaches the « A » in « A real » that is at work in the psychoanalytical clinic.
Miquel Bassols conceives the real as « a bomb that can explose anytime ».
Vicente Palomera approches an enigmatic and disruptive real with a tool: the sinthome.
Juan Carlos Indart talks to us about the analyst's desire in its orientation towards the real.
No GPS for the psychoanalyst, but rather an orientation by the real.
wonders how to make the real speak.
alerts us to the dangers of genetic interventions aiming at the real of the body.
The hypermodern subject defends himself against the real, against the unforeseen, with the realism of the image.
opposes the disorder generated by science with that which psychoanalysis starts out from.
There is something of the real of the symptom that is missing in the face of this unbearable lightness of being.
underscores how the lawless real expresses itself in contemporary clinic.
Elucidating the notion of dismantling the defence in reference to the interpretation backwards.
compares the real to an unforeseeable and inevitable fuzziness
evokes the treatment of a new real that the Church has to deal with.